Transmission of vertical vibration through a seat: Effect of thickness of foam cushions at the seat pan and the backrest

The perception of vehicle ride comfort is influenced by the dynamic performance of full-depth foam used in many vehicle seats. The effects of the thickness of foam on the dynamic stiffness (i.e., stiffness and damping as a function of frequency) of foam cushions with three thicknesses (60, 80, and 100 mm), and the vibration transmitted through these cushions at the seat pan and the backrest were measured with 12 subjects (6 males and 6 females). With increasing thickness, the stiffness and the damping of the foam decreased. With increasing thickness of foam at the seat pan, the resonance frequencies around 4 Hz in the vertical in-line and fore-and-aft cross-axis transmissibilities of the seat pan cushion and the backrest cushion decreased. For the conditions investigated, it is concluded that the thickness of foam at a vertical backrest has little effect on the vertical in-line or fore-and-aft cross-axis transmissibilities of the foam at either the seat pan or the backrest. The frequencies of the primary resonances around 4 Hz in the vertical in-line transmissibility and the fore-and-aft cross-axis transmissibility of foam at the seat pan were highly correlated. Compared to sitting on a rigid seat pan with a foam backrest, sitting with foam at both the seat pan and the backrest reduced the resonance frequency in the vertical in-line transmissibility of the backrest foam and increased the associated transmissibility at resonance, while the fore-and-aft cross-axis transmissibility of the backrest was little affected. Compared to sitting without a backrest, sitting with a rigid vertical backrest increased the resonance frequency of the fore-and-aft cross-axis transmissibility of the seat pan cushion and increased the transmissibility at resonance.Relevance to industryThe transmissibility of a seat is determined by the dynamic properties of the occupant of the seat and the dynamic properties of the seat. This study shows how the thicknesses of foam at a seat pan and foam at a backrest affect the in-line and cross-axis transmissibilities of the foams at the seat pan and the backrest. The findings have application to the design of vehicle seats to minimise the transmission of vibration to the body.     

Review of anthropometric considerations for tractor seat design

Tractor driving imposes a lot of physical and mental stress upon the operator. If the operator's seat is not comfortable, his work performance may be poor and there is also a possibility of accidents. The optimal design of tractor seat may be achieved by integrating anthropometric data with other technical features of the design. This paper reviews the existing information on the tractor seat design that considers anthropometry and biomechanical factors and gives an approach for seat design based on anthropometric data. The anthropometric dimensions, i.e. popliteal height sitting (5th percentile), hip breadth sitting (95th percentile), buttock popliteal length (5th percentile), interscye breadth (5th and 95th percentile) and sitting acromion height (5th percentile) of agricultural workers need to be taken into consideration for design of seat height, seat pan width, seat pan length, seat backrest width and seat backrest height, respectively, of a tractor. The seat dimensions recommended for tractor operator's comfort based on anthropometric data of 5434 Indian male agricultural workers were as follows: seat height of 380 mm, seat pan width of 420–450 mm, seat backrest width of 380–400 mm (bottom) and 270–290 mm (top), seat pan length of 370±10 mm, seat pan tilt of 5–7° backward and seat backrest height of 350 mm.

Relevance to industry

The approach presented in this paper for tractor seat design based on anthropometric considerations will help the tractor seat designers to develop and introduce seats suiting to the requirements of the user population. This will not only enhance the comfort of the tractor operators but may also help to reduce the occupational health problems of tractor operators.     

The Influence of Various Seat Design Parameters: A Computational Analysis

Nowadays, low back pain becomes a common healthcare problem. Poor or unsuitable seat design is related to the discomfort and other healthcare problems of users. The aim of this study is to investigate the influence of seat design variables on the compressive loadings of lumbar joints. A basis that includes a musculoskeletal human body model and a chair model has been developed using LifeMOD Biomechanics Modeller. Inverse and forward dynamic simulations have been performed for various seat design parameters. The results show that the inclination of backrest and seat pan may or may not decrease the compressive spinal joint forces, depending on other conditions. The medium‐level height and depth of seat pan and the medium‐level and high‐level height of backrest are found to cause the minimum compressive loads on lumbar joints. This work contributes to a better understanding of sitting biomechanics and provides some useful guidelines for seat design.     

A parametric investigation on seat/occupant contact forces and their relationship with initially perceived discomfort using a configurable seat

The present work investigates the contact forces between sitters and seat as well as their correlations with perceived discomfort. Twelve different economy class aeroplane seat configurations were simulated using a multi-adjustable experimental seat by varying seat pan and backrest angles, as well as seat pan compressed surface. Eighteen males and 18 females, selected by their body mass index and stature, tested these configurations for two sitting postures. Perceived discomfort was significantly affected by seat parameters and posture and correlated both with normal force distribution on the seat-pan surface and with normal forces at the lumbar and head supports. Lower discomfort ratings were obtained for more evenly distributed normal forces on the seat pan. Shear force at the seat pan surface was at its lowest when sitters were allowed to self-select their seat-pan angle, supporting that a shear force should be reduced but not zeroed to improve seating comfort.

Practitioner Summary: The effects of seat-pan and backrest angle, anthropometric dimensions and sitting posture on contact forces and perceived discomfort were investigated using a multi-adjustable experimental seat. In addition to preferred seat profile parameters, the present work provides quantitative guidelines on contact force requirement for improving seating comfort.     

Design of combine harvester seat based on anthropometric data of Iranian operators

Harvesting operation with agricultural combines imposes excessive physical loads on the operators and the poorly designed seats may be an important contributory factor in this regard. This aims of this field study were to evaluate the possible mismatch between seat dimensions of existing harvesting combines and anthropometric characteristics of 200 Iranian operators and to propose seat dimensions based on anthropometric principles. The anthropometric dimensions of each individual operator were compared to the relative seat dimensions using the equations proposed in the literature. The results showed a considerable mismatch for different seat dimensions including upper backrest width (100%), seat height (97%), armrest height (83.7%), seat width (52.8%), lower backrest width (40.6%) and seat depth (39.5%). This meant that the existing combine seats were too high, too narrow and too shallow and had armrests and backrests which did not match with body dimensions of the majority of the operators. It was shown that compared to the existing designs, the new proposed dimensions (including seat height = 400 mm, seat width = 450 mm, seat depth = 410 mm, armrest height = 290 mm, backrest height = 420 mm, upper backrest width = 360 mm and lower backrest width = 400 mm) better matched to the operator's anthropometry, with the match percentages ranging from 77% to 100%.Relevance to industryThe design and manufacturing of agricultural machinery should be made based on the anthropometric characteristics of actual users to avoid unnecessary demands on them. This study provide additional data on the operator's anthropometry that can be used as a starting point for designing more appropriate agricultural machinery or used by other researchers in the field.     

Effect of lumbar support on seating comfort predicted by a whole human body-seat model

Automobile seat greatly affects the ride comfort of drivers in a prolonged driving. Not only the layout parameters of automobile seats, such as seat height, cushion inclination angle, backrest inclination angle, etc, but also the backrest surface related with lumbar support all affect the seating comfort. The human body-seat system includes the three-dimensional data of body based on anatomy and anthropometry, three-dimensional data of seat and adjustable assembly interaction between body and seat based on human body kinematics. Body height and driving posture are adjusted in POSER software, then the solid model of human skin, skeleton and muscle are created in ANSA software, and the integrated model of body-seat system is created in ABAQUS software. The adjustment of the lumbar support parameters is achieved by setting boundary condition of lumbar support region of seats. The finite element model of human body-seat system is validated by comparison to available literature results. At last the finite element model is applied to analyze the effect of lumbar support parameters of seats on the interaction between body and seat under the action of gravity. The pressure value and distribution, contact area, total force of backrest and intervertebral disc stress are obtained. The result shows that the optimal thickness of seat's lumbar support size for the seating comfort is 10 mm after comprehensive comparison and evaluation.Relevance to industry: This study investigated the effects of lumbar support on seating comfort, and can be used to protect the lumbar health. The modeling and simulation method can be applied for the optimization design of vehicle seats.     

Malaysian sitting anthropometry for seat fit parameters

This article presents sitting anthropometry data for Malaysians focusing on seat fit parameters. It offers additional data regarding seat design requirements as there have been only a few efforts made to establish anthropometry data in Malaysia. An analysis using a measurement composed of 16 common and important dimensions in seat design was done with 216 subjects. Data collection was done by using direct measuring methods with standard equipment. Malaysian automobile seat fit parameters, namely backrest width, backrest height, cushion width, and cushion length were established from collected anthropometric dimensions: interscye breadth (5th percentile female and 95th percentile male), sitting shoulder height (5th percentile female), hip breadth (95th percentile female), and buttock–popliteal length (5th percentile female), respectively. From the data collected, this study finds that the fit parameter dimensions are bigger than other Asians' 95th percentile values but smaller than the Filipino and the Thai data being compared in this study. The female 5th percentile values for cushion length and cushion width are the smallest. In addition, two local automobile seats were measured and compared with the data. It was observed that the cushion lengths of both seats were too long for the 5th percentile female of the current data. This study provides seat fit parameters–the most fundamental part of automotive seat design, especially for the Malaysian population. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Effect of the seating condition on the transmission of vibration through the seat pan and backrest

Changes in the seating condition may change the body posture which could affect the transmission of vibration through a vehicle seat. This study investigates the effect of different seating conditions on the transmission of vibration through a car seat. Ten male subjects sat on the passenger seat of a sedan car driven at 60 km/h adopting one of six conditions at a time. The VDV was measured on the seat and backrest. Backrest contact affected the VDV measured on the seat pan in the z- and y-axis only. Increasing the backrest angle increased the VDV at the backrest in the x-direction and reduced the VDV at the backrest in the z-direction. With the increase in the backrest angle, the total VDV at the backrest became higher than the total VDV on the seat pan. The study showed no effect of foot position and contact with a headrest on the VDVs.Relevance to industryThis research presents the effect of the seating condition on the transmission of vibration through the seat pan and backrest of a car seat. Research of this kind may help seat manufacturers recommend seating conditions that reduce discomfort caused by whole-body vibration.     

Intervention on seat adjustment among drivers of forest tractors

The aim of this study was to clarify the ergonomics of forest tractor drivers' sitting conditions, to study how well drivers had adjusted the seats of forest tractors and to study the short-term effect of the backrest adjustment and the use of accessory lumbar support on neck-shoulder and low-back symptoms of drivers. The subjects in this field study were 100 male forest tractor drivers aged 21–50 years (37 ± 7 years) from central and eastern Finland. The drivers were visited twice, and a two-week intervention on seat adjustment was carried out between the visits. The methods used were interview and assessment of the seat. The height and inclination of the seat, inclination of the backrest and the stiffness of the spring were measured; after the measurements, the technician adjusted the seat. Half of the drivers were given an accessory lumbar support (Camp 21025) and advice concerning its use. Pain, stiffness and fatigue of the low-back and neck-shoulder at the end of the shift were reported to have diminished among nearly all drivers. There were no differences between the intervention groups regardless of whether the inclination of the backrest was adjusted or not or whether the drivers had used the lumbar support or not during the two-week intervention period. Relevance to industryThe results of this study can be taken into account when improvements are made in the ergonomics of the seats of forest tractors.     

The postural support of seats: a study of driver preferences during simulated tractor operation

The overall comfort of four current production tractor seats and some individual features of seat design have been assessed by a method of paired comparisons. The experiment was carried out under both static and dynamic conditions and subjects had to adopt natural postures similar to those adopted when ploughing. The results suggest that operators can differentiate seat comfort differences reliably. Subjects' posture has proved important particularly when assessing the height of the back rest. On the other hand most appraisals were not significantly affected by the conditions (dynamic or static) of the simulation. An exception to this was the cushion length. This experiment has finally produced enough information on the relative importance of various aspects to enable us to design an experimental seat to be used in a series of experiments to assess specific features of seat aspects. The ultimate objectives of this investigation are to determine what aspects of seat and workplace design affect the comfort of the operator and how these can be altered to improve the tractor driver's posture.     

Ergonomic evaluation of standard and alternative pallet jack handless

AimTransportation of materials using a pallet jack pulled behind the operator is common due to the visual advantages while transporting fully loaded pallets. The objective of this laboratory study was to quantify muscle activity, posture, and low back compressive and shear forces while completing typical pallet jack activities using a standard handle that required one handed pulling of a pallet jack compared to an alternative handle that allowed for two handed pushing.MethodsParticipants (n = 14) performed six to ten trials of common pallet jack tasks (straight travel and turning) with each handle. Posture analysis of the trunk and right upper extremity was performed using Motion Analysis (Santa Rosa, CA, USA) and back compressive and shear forces were analyzed using 3D Static Strength Prediction Program (University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI). Activity of the upper trapezius (UT), pectoralis major (PM), flexor digitorum superficialis (FDS) and extensor digitorum (ED) muscles were recorded (Telemyo 2400 T, Noraxon, Scottsdale, Arizona) and normalized to percent reference voluntary contraction values. All outcomes were compared using the paired t-test.ResultsPeak and mean muscle activity of the PM (p < 0.001) and ED (p < 0.01) were significantly higher using the alternative push handle during all three tasks. There were larger compressive forces at L4/L5 (p < 0.08) and L5/S1 (p < 0.002) using the alternative handle, and greater shear forces using the standard handle at both L4/L5 (p < 0.0001) and L5/S1 (p < 0.000).DiscussionThe standard handle outperformed the alternative handle with regard to muscle activity. The alternative handle had significantly greater compressive forces at L5/S1 due to the pushing nature of the hand-handle interface, yet the standard handle increased shear forces at both L4/L5 and L5/S1 levels in the low back.ConclusionIn this analysis, there was not a clear benefit to using either handle in terms of trunk strength capacity and varied benefits and drawbacks to each handle when comparing compressive and shear forces in the low back. However, given favorable subjective reports described in a prior publication, and the increased reliance on dynamic versus passive force production, facilitating a workers' ability to push a pallet jack while travelling with large loads is worth further investigation.     

The effect of posture and vibration magnitude on the vertical vibration transmissibility of tractor suspension system

The efficiency of suspension seat can be influenced by several factors such as the input vibration, the dynamic characteristics of the seat and the dynamic characteristics of the human body. The objective of this paper is to study the effect of sitting postures and vibration magnitude on the vibration transmissibility of a suspension system of an agricultural tractor seat. Eleven (11) healthy male subjects participated in the study. All subjects were asked to sit on the suspension system. Four (4) different sitting postures were investigated – i) “relax”, ii) “slouch”, iii) “tense”, and iv) “with backrest support”. All subjects were exposed to random vertical vibration in the range of 1–20 Hz, at three vibration magnitudes - 0.5, 1.0 and 2.0 m/s² r.m.s for 60 s. The results showed that there were three pronounced peaks in the seat transmissibility, with the primary resonance was found at 1.75–2.5 Hz for every sitting postures. The “backrest” condition had the highest transmissibility resonance (1.46), while the “slouch” posture had the highest Seat Effective Amplitude Transmissibility (SEAT) values (64.7%). Changes in vibration magnitude for “relax” posture from 0.5 to 2.0 m/s² r.m.s resulted in greater reduction in the primary resonance frequency of seat transmissibility. The SEAT values decreased with increased vibration magnitude. It can be suggested that variations in posture and vibration magnitude affected the vibration transmission through the suspension system, indicating the non-linear effect on the interaction between the human body and the suspension system.Relevance to industry: Investigating the posture adopted during agricultural activities, and the effects of various magnitudes of vibration on the suspension system's performance are beneficial to the industry. The findings regarding their influence on the human body may be used to optimize the suspension system's performance.     

Discomfort of seated persons exposed to low frequency lateral and roll oscillation: Effect of seat cushion

The discomfort caused by lateral oscillation, roll oscillation, and fully roll-compensated lateral oscillation has been investigated at frequencies between 0.25 and 1.0 Hz when sitting on a rigid seat and when sitting on a compliant cushion, both without a backrest. Judgements of vibration discomfort and the transmission of lateral and roll oscillation through the seat cushion were obtained with 20 subjects. Relative to the rigid seat, the cushion increased lateral acceleration and roll oscillation at the lower frequencies and also increased discomfort during lateral oscillation (at frequencies less than 0.63 Hz), roll oscillation (at frequencies less than 0.4 Hz), and fully roll-compensated lateral oscillation (at frequencies between 0.315 and 0.5 Hz). The root-sums-of-squares of the frequency-weighted lateral and roll acceleration at the seat surface predicted the greater vibration discomfort when sitting on the cushion. The frequency-dependence of the predicted discomfort may be improved by adjusting the frequency weighting for roll acceleration at frequencies between 0.25 and 1.0 Hz.     

PHYSIOLOGICAL BASIS OF TRACTOR DESIGN

Energy expenditure of tractor driving varies from 1-4 kcal/min depending on the particular agricultural task performed. The paper is concerned with principles underlying the design and positioning of tractor controls and seats in such a way as would enable the operator to carry out this strenuous work under the most favourable conditions.

Energy consumption and electrical skin capacity of the operator were measured during tractor driving with a number of different types of seat. The most satisfactory seat had a parallel seat suspension and hydraulic damping of tractor vibration. The extra cost of this seat above that most commonly supplied was insignificant in relation to the total cost of the tractor.

A study was made of the positioning relative to the operator of brake and clutch pedals, foot rest, steering column and steering wheel. The techniques employed in this study were : measurement of O₂ consumption and heart rate of the operator and of forces required in depressing the pedals and turning the steering wheel. In each instance the optimal positions of control and operator are illustrated by a detailed diagram.

In many existing tractors there is a separate brake pedal for each wheel (for rapid turning) and for both wheels together (for braking). A new type of brake with a single pedal (accident proof) is described. This brakes both wheels unless the steering wheel is also turned, when the brake on the outer wheel is released.

A standard commercial tractor was modified according to the principles described. Energy consumption of operators was found to be 13-29 per cent below that with unmodified equipment and the heart rate 40-45 per cent lower. It is believed that fatigue is reduced more than the energy figures suggest.     

Predicting the discomfort caused by tractor vibration

A field study was conducted to investigate how the discomfort caused by the vibration of an agricultural tractor can be predicted from objective measurements of the vibration in the cabin. Eleven professional drivers judged the vibration discomfort produced by four different tractors on sixteen different test runs. At the same time, for all the tests, the multi-axis vibration in the cabin was measured on the floor, the seat pan and the seat backrest. For each of the 704 tests carried out, the discomfort caused by the vibration was predicted from the measured vibration in the cabin using a total of twenty different analysis procedures. The relative merits of the different prediction procedures were investigated by comparing, on an individual basis for each driver/tractor combination, the statistical significance of the correlations between the subjective judgements and the predicted values. There was considerable variability in the drivers' subjective responses, but it was concluded that, overall, the best procedure for predicting the vibration discomfort in an agricultural tractor is that recommended by ISO 2631 (International Organization for Standardization 1978), using the frequency weighted rms values of the vibration (0·5–20?Hz) measured on the seat pan in the three orthogonal directions, and taking the square-root-of-the-sum-of-the-squares of the values in order to combine the directions as recommended in Amendment 1 to ISO 2631 (International Organization for Standardization 1982).     

Effects of aircraft seat pitch on interface pressure and passenger discomfort

Seat pitch, defined as the distance from a point on the back of one seat to the same point on the seat in front, is one of the most important factors influencing aircraft seating comfort. This study assessed the influence of different airline seat pitches on subjective ratings of discomfort and body-seat interface contact pressures. This was a laboratory within-subjects study using an aircraft interior mock up to vary seat pitch. Twelve participants completed 1 h of sitting in each of five different seat pitches (28inches, 30inches, 32inches, 34inches, and 36inches). Interface pressure mats measured seat and backrest pressure distribution, subjective rating scales were used to measure overall and local body region discomfort. The results showed that overall body and local body region discomfort ratings tend to be lower when the seat pitch increased from 28 inches to 36 inches (p < 0.05). For pressure variables, the upper back average contact area, upper/lower back average contact pressure, upper/lower back average peak contact pressure, right buttock average contact area, left/right thigh buttock average peak contact pressure, and left buttock average peak contact pressure were significantly affected by seat pitch(p < 0.05). Separate analyses support that seat pitch was more strongly correlated with backrest interface pressure than with seat pan pressure. In conclusion, seat pitch was found to be an important factor associated with body-seat contact pressure and discomfort ratings.     

Seat adjustment – capacity and repeatability among occupants in a modern car

Families in the Western world have a car and several family members share the same car. In this study, 154 participants have adjusted a driver's seat three times. The primary objective was to study intrapersonal repeatability and intraclass correlation (ICC) on seat; length adjustment, backrest angle, seat front edge and seat rear edge adjustment, related to participant age, sex, stature and weight. Length adjustment has the best intrapersonal repeatability within two repetitions, 49 mm and ICC-value 0.87. Females and younger participants (age <40 years) adjust seats generally more accurately. Females adjust the seat 41 mm more forward, 120 mm compared to men 79 mm counted from 0-starting position. Females sit with more upright seat backrests, 46° compared to 43° for males counted from 0-starting position. Females sit higher than males in both the frontal and rear part of the seat cushion.     

Human–seat interface analysis of upper and lower body weight distribution

The human–seat interfaces were analyzed to determine the differential distribution of the body weight to the components of seat. Fifteen volunteers were tested on a simulated seat system with two piezoelectric force platforms, one placed as chair seat pan and the other placed on the floor surface as footrest. The seated configurations included back inclines (75° and 80°), upright (90°) and reclines (95°, 105° and 115°), absence or presence of armrest (adjusted at 62–68 cm of height), forward and backward sloping of the seat pan, and supported and unsupported back. The armrest and backrest assemblies were isolated from the force platforms. The difference in the body weight (kgf) to the sum of forces recorded at seat pan and feet yielded the extent of weight transferred to other features (e.g., backrest and armrest). The weight distributed at seat was 10–12% less at back inclines (p<0.01) as compared to upright unsupported sitting. With the backrest reclined beyond 95°, the weight at seat gradually decreased by 9% at 115° recline. The load distributed at feet varied narrowly; however, it was significantly greater (p<0.01) at upright supported back, compared to unsupported back. The height of the armrest was optimized at 68 cm, since the weight distribution at seat pan consistently reduced by 12% at that height, as compared to the absence of armrest (F_(4,524)=8.80, p<0.05). The suggested height of the armrest corresponded to 40% of the body stature of the selected volunteers. The load distributed at feet was 18% greater with the presence of armrest, indicating that a part of the weight of the upper leg fell on the seat pan, when the armrest was absent. The weight fell on the seat in slouch posture was 5% less than in upright sitting, while the weight at feet was marginally higher in slouch than in upright posture. The study maintained that the horizontal as well as 5° forward slope of the seat might be the preferred choice, since the load distributed at seat was highest at backward sloping seat for all conditions of supported and unsupported back. The study reaffirms that the backrest and armrest have conjoint influence in reducing the load distributed at seat, which in turn might help in mitigating stress on the spinal and other paraspinal structures.

Relevance to Industry

The human–seat interface analysis and understanding of body weight distribution to the components of seat may be beneficial for ergo-design application in optimizing parameters for chair configurations that provide comfort and safety to the user.     

Sitting comfort in an aircraft seat with different seat inclination angles

Passengers' comfort experience during flights is important in choosing their flights. The focus of this study is passengers’ perceived comfort in different climbing angles during ascent. Twenty-six participants were invited to experience three inclination angles including 3°, 14° and 18° in a Boeing 737 cabin. The angle of 3° was used to simulate cruising stage and the other two were used to simulate different climbing angles. Participants experienced each setting for 20 min where the perceived comfort, their heart rate variability(HRV), and their body contact pressure values on the backrest and seat pan were recorded with questionnaires, HRV bands and pressure mats respectively. The results indicate a preference of 14° inclination angle resembling the cruising angle (3°) and having the slowest moving speed of the center of pressure (COP) on both the backrest and seat pan.     

Seating discomfort for tractor operators – a critical review

A large number of studies have been conducted and researchers have suggested several criteria for evaluating discomfort and the suitability of a tractor seat in a given working condition. The studies have led to various parameters, viz. the body pressure distributed under and supporting both the buttocks, thighs and the back of an operator, control of posture in static or dynamic condition, ride vibration, exposure time on task and other factors. But in the absence of a more definitive and the most logical criteria particularly from biomechanical viewpoint, the researchers will continue to design conditions and procedures to understand the seat dynamics and evaluate the seating discomfort. Therefore, this paper reviews the research information available in this regard and attempts to set the most appropriate procedure for assessment of seating discomfort during tractor driving.

Relevance to industry

This paper attempts to project the most appropriate method of assessment and selection of tractor seats from engineering and biomechanical view point which could be adopted by the tractor seat manufacturers. It is designed to enhance the feeling of comfort, safety, convenience, and results in higher work output from the operator.