地源热泵地埋管岩土热响应测试方法与应用

地源热泵地埋管热响应测试是研究土壤热物性参数及地埋管换热器性能最有效的方法之一。文中结合南京某办公楼一个地源热泵测试工程实例,探讨了地源热泵热响应测试的测试步骤、测试方法和数据处理。通过对地埋管进出口水温、流量和加热功率的实时采集,分析研究了土壤的热物性以及地埋管热响应的放热和取热量。     

北方地区岩土导热系数及换热量的测试研究

岩土导热系数是地源热泵地埋管换热器的重要设计参数;测井单位深度换热量是地埋管换热器系统的设计依据。掌握工程区域岩土的热物性及换热性能,是保证地源热泵系统高效、稳定运行的关键。文章建立了现场测试岩土导热系数及换热量的方法,并结合沈阳浑南高新技术产业开发区某地源热泵工程,测试分析了岩土导热系数和测井单位深度换热量。结果表明,该区域的岩土具有较好的导热能力,适合采用地埋管地源热泵系统;在特殊地理条件下设计地源热泵系统方案前,应对拟建区域的地质条件进行全面勘探,以优选工程区域,为岩土热响应测试结果的可靠性提供保障。     

同轴地埋管换热器岩土热响应试验研究

岩土热物理性质是影响地源热泵系统设计和运营的关键因素,对位于武汉市洪山区的2口不同深度的同轴地埋管换热孔分别进行48 h的热响应试验,并对同轴地埋管换热器内外管之间环形空间中的平均流体温度进行测试.根据同轴地埋管换热器的几何特性,以简便实用的方式测量同轴地埋管换热器环状空间传热流体的平均温度,结合同轴地埋管换热器钻孔热...     

热响应测试在土壤热交换器设计中的应用

分析了土壤热交换器系统的影响因素以及设计与施工中存在的问题,介绍了自主研制的移动式地源热响应测试装置原理与构成。针对天津市某地源热泵项目,阐述了热响应测试的方法与步骤,得到了项目所在地的无干扰地温以及地埋管系统的供回水温度响应曲线。利用线源理论,得到了地埋管换热器钻孔的导热系数及热阻,分析了测试装置与环境的热损失和热增益、测试时间、供电稳定性、无干扰地温、不同深度土壤热导率的变化以及地下水流动对热响应测试造成的影响。测试结论对于指导土壤热交换器设计与施工具有一定的参考价值。     

地源热泵桩基埋管传热性能测试与数值模拟研究

阐述了地源热泵地埋管传热性能的测试原理,并与热响应测试原理相对比.依据传热性能测试法,搭建实验台测试了4种桩基埋管在额定进口水温下的传热性能,并考查了不同进口水温对W型埋管传热性能的影响.进而采用数值模拟方法研究了不同埋管类型的传热性能,与测试结果相比有较好的吻合性.该文提出的传热性能测试方法和数值模拟方法可准确确定单位井深放热量,为地源热泵系统的优化设计提供参考.     

地源热泵岩土热响应测试方法及数据分析

土壤导热系数的大小直接对土壤源热泵系统中埋地换热器的面积和初投资有显著影响.现场测试法是研究土壤热物性参数最有效的方法之一,结合邢台市沙河收费站地源热泵测试工程实例,介绍了地源热泵热响应测试的测试步骤、测试方法和数据分析.实测结果与传统查手册的结果相比更为准确可靠,为当地地源热泵系统的准确设计提供了依据.     

陕西渭南地区岩土热响应测试与分析

地层热物性参数的确定对浅层地热能地源热泵系统的设计至关重要。依托陕西渭南某地源热泵项目,应用恒流法进行了岩土热响应测试,测试共进行了58 h,根据线热源理论对测试数据进行分析计算,求得准确的地层热物性参数,得到工区地层导热系数为2.16 W/(m∙K),比热容为2.39 MJ/(m³∙K),单U地埋管每延米换热量45 W。该研究结果可为项目后期设计与施工提供了相关参考和依据。     

岩土热响应测试系统的研究与开发

现场热响应测试是实施地源热泵工程的关键环节。本文自主研发了岩土热响应测试系统,既能进行放热试验又能进行吸热试验。用VB语言开发了基于EXCEL的热响应分析软件。该系统及软件在绵阳烟厂得到成功应用,获得了现场土壤原始温度、导热系数以及体积比热、单U管和双u管每延米孔深的吸放热量参考值。测试数据为工程设计提供了依据。     

废弃冻结管作为地源热泵换热器换热量的计算研究

采用废弃的冻结管替代传统地埋管地源热泵换热器,实现浅部和深部的冷量和热量的利用是热泵技术一种新的取热途径。阐述了地埋管地源热泵换热器的换热量的计算过程,并以某工程实例为依据,采用换热量计算模型,对该工程地埋管地源热泵进行了冬夏季换热量测试。通过对测试数据比较,最终得到了该工程可靠的地埋管换热性能参数。     

不同地质条件下地埋管热响应测试分析与比较

为获取不同地质条件下地埋管换热器换热特性,选取位于夏热冬冷地区的三个测试地点:浙江莫干山、上海浦江镇、江苏盐城。分别对所在地的地源热泵系统地埋管换热器开展热响应试验,利用线热源模型进行计算分析。得到莫干山、浦江、盐城的岩土导热系数分别为2.40 W/(m·℃)、1.92 W/(m·℃)、1.84 W/(m·℃)。岩石地质所具有的高热扩散性对地埋管换热器换热效果有促进作用;不能用"单位延米换热量"这个单一参数分析地埋管换热器换热效果。     

Analysis and thermal response test for vertical ground heat exchanger with two U‐loop configuration

An in situ thermal response test (TRT) is applied to evaluate the thermal performance of the vertical ground heat exchanger (GHX) with two U‐loop configuration. A line source method is used to derive the thermal conductivity and borehole thermal resistance from the measured data. Analyses are made to improve the interpretation of TRT data and to investigate the active area of interest in the borehole. Load tests of the GHX are performed to examine the daily variations of ground and mean fluid temperatures associated with daily intermittent operation of ground source heat pump system. Results show that while the ground thermal conductivity of two U‐loop GHX is moderately increased, the borehole thermal resistance is significantly reduced, compared with the single U‐loop GHX. Of the borehole thermal resistance components evaluated, the grout thermal resistance is the most governing one in the borehole heat transfer (77% of the total borehole thermal resistance), whereas the convective thermal resistance in the tube is almost negligible (less than 2%). Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

An in situ thermal response test for borehole heat exchangers of the ground-coupled heat pump system

Thermal response tests (TRTs) are crucial for the estimation of the ground thermal properties and thermal performance of the borehole heat exchanger (BHE) of the ground-coupled heat pump (GCHP) system. In this article, a TRT apparatus was designed and built to measure the temperature response of inlet and outlet sections of BHE in the test borehole, the apparatus can effectively operate under both constant heating flux modes and heat injection and extraction modes with a constant inlet temperature. A TRT for a project of GCHP located in the Jiangsu province of China was carried out by the experimental apparatus. Based on the experimental data, the heat transfer performances of BHE under heating and cooling modes were evaluated, and the ground thermal properties, which include the ground thermal conductivity, ground volumetric specific heat, borehole thermal resistance and effective soil thermal resistance, were determined by the line source model. The results indicate that the experimental device and analysis model proposed in this article can be effectively applied to estimate the ground thermal properties and thermal performance of BHE. During the process of thermal response of ground, the fluid temperatures vary acutely at the start-stage of 8 h, and then tend to be a steady state after 40 h. The test data during the start-stage should be discarded for improving the estimation accuracy of ground thermal properties. At the same time, the effective soil thermal resistance increases continuously with time and a steady-state value would be reached after the start-time, and this steady-state thermal resistance can be used to evaluate the required length of BHE. In addition, the heat transfer rate of the BHE under different operating conditions can be used for the further evaluation on long-term operation performance of GCHPs.     

Back‐analyses of in‐situ thermal response test (TRT) for evaluating ground thermal conductivity

In this study, a series of computational fluid dynamics (CFD) numerical analyses was performed in order to evaluate the performance of six full‐scale closed‐loop vertical ground heat exchangers constructed in a test bed located in Wonju, South Korea. The high‐density polyethylene pipe, borehole grouting and surrounding ground formation were modeled using FLUENT, a finite‐volume method program, for analyzing the heat transfer process of the system. Two user‐defined functions accounting for the difference in the temperatures of the circulating inflow and outflow fluid and the variation of the surrounding ground temperature with depth were adopted in the FLUENT model. The relevant thermal properties of materials measured in laboratory were used in the numerical analyses to compare the thermal efficiency of various types of the heat exchangers installed in the test bed. The numerical simulations provide verification for the in‐situ thermal response test (TRT) results. The numerical analysis with the ground thermal conductivity of 4.0 W/m?K yielded by the back‐analysis was in better agreement with the in‐situ TRT result than with the ground thermal conductivity of 3.0 W/m?K. From the results of CFD back‐analyses, the effective thermal conductivities estimated from both the in‐situ TRT and numerical analysis are smaller than the ground thermal conductivity (=4.0 W/m?K) that is input in the numerical model because of the intrinsic limitation of the line source model that simplifies a borehole assemblage as an infinitely long line source in the homogeneous material. However, the discrepancy between the ground thermal conductivity and the effective thermal conductivity from the in‐situ TRT decreases when borehole resistance decreases with a new three pipe‐type heat exchanger leads to less thermal interference between the inlet and outlet pipes than the conventional U‐loop type heat exchanger. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Reference data sets for vertical borehole ground heat exchanger models and thermal response test analysis

Ground source heat pump systems often use vertical boreholes to exchange heat with the ground. Two areas of active research are the development of models to predict the thermal performance of vertical boreholes and improved procedures for analysis of in situ thermal conductivity tests, commonly known as thermal response tests (TRT). Both the models and analysis procedures ultimately need to be validated by comparing them to actual borehole data sets. This paper describes reference data sets for researchers to test their borehole models. The data sets are from a large laboratory “sandbox” containing a borehole with a U-tube. The tests are made under more controlled conditions than can be obtained in field tests. Thermal response tests on the borehole include temperature measurements on the borehole wall and within the surrounding soil, which are not usually available in field tests. The test data provide independent values of soil thermal conductivity and borehole thermal resistance for verifying borehole models and TRT analysis procedures. As an illustration, several borehole models are compared with one of the thermal response tests.     

基于圆柱热源模型的现场测量地下岩土热物性方法

在埋地换热器圆柱热源模型的基础上采用参数估计法建立了一套可用于现场确定土壤热物性的方法。结合地源热泵系统单井热响应测试实验,计算了地下岩土热物性参数,模拟了管内流体平均温度随时间变化规律,与实验值比较,发现该方法较线热源法更加接近实际。     

Research on thermal runaway test platform design for energy-storage lithium-ion batteries

介绍了锂离子储能电池热失控研究的目的和意义,探讨了储能电池与动力电池在热失控检测实验研究关注上的异同,从理论分析和实验研究两方面归纳了影响储能电池热失控的促发条件及对应的关键阈值.在此基础上,完成了模拟热失控促发条件和满足阈值要求的检测实验平台设计及功能验证,并对此平台的应用前景进行了展望.     

Finite line-source model for borehole heat exchangers: effect of vertical temperature variations

A solution to the three-dimensional finite line-source (FLS) model for borehole heat exchangers (BHEs) that takes into account the prevailing geothermal gradient and allows arbitrary ground surface temperature changes is presented. Analytical expressions for the average ground temperature are derived by integrating the exact solution over the line-source depth. A self-consistent procedure to evaluate the in situ thermal response test (TRT) data is outlined. The effective thermal conductivity and the effective borehole thermal resistance can be determined by fitting the TRT data to the time-series expansion obtained for the average temperature.     

竖直埋管地热换热器钻孔内的传热分析

准三维模型为竖直埋管地热换热器的结构优化提供了较为精确的理论基础。利用准三维模型对竖直埋管地热换热器进行分析与研究得出，不同的行程布置对双U型埋管地热换热器的传热性能有较大影响。就钻孔内热阻的对比，双U型埋管比单U型埋管钻孔内的热阻低，因而双U型埋管地热换热器较单U型埋管地热换热器更为合理。     

Experimental performance of borehole heat exchangers and grouting materials for ground source heat pumps

The system performance of a ground source heat pump (HP) system is determined by the HP characteristics itself and by the thermal interaction between the ground and its borehole heat exchanger (BHE). BHE performance is strongly influenced by the thermal properties of the ground formation, grouting material, and BHE type. Experimental investigations on different BHE types and grouting materials were carried out in Belgium. Its performances were investigated with in situ thermal response tests to determine the thermal conductivity (λ) and borehole resistance (R_b). The line‐source method was used to analyze the results, and the tests showed the viability of the method. The main goal was to determine the thermal borehole resistance of BHEs, including the effect of the grouting material. The ground thermal conductivity was measured as 2.21 W m^?1 K^?1, a high value for the low fraction of water‐saturated sand and the high clay content at the test field. The borehole resistance for a standard coaxial tube with cement–bentonite grouting varied from 0.344 to 0.162 K W^?1 m for the double U‐tube with cement–bentonite mixture (52% reduction). Grouting material based on purely a cement–bentonite mixture results in a high thermal borehole resistance. Addition of sand to the mixture leads to a better performance. The use of thermally enhanced grouts did not improve the performance significantly in comparison with only a low‐cost grouting material as sand. Potential future applications are possible in our country using a mobile testing device, such as characteristics, standardization, quality control, and certification for drilling companies and ground source HP applications, and in situ research for larger systems. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Transient heat transfer in a U-tube borehole heat exchanger

A transient heat transfer model has been development for a thermal response test (TRT) on a vertical borehole with a U-tube. Vertical borehole heat exchangers are frequently coupled to ground source heat pumps, which heat and cool buildings. The model provides an analytical solution for the vertical temperature profiles of the circulating fluid through the U-tube, and the temperature distribution in the ground. The model is verified with data sets from a laboratory sandbox and field TRTs, as well as a previously reported numerical solution. Unlike previous analytical models, the vertical profiles for the circulating fluid are generated by the model without any assumption of their functional form.