动态硫化EPDM/EVA热塑性弹性体的制备与性能

采用动态硫化法制备了三元乙丙橡胶(EPDM)/乙烯-醋酸乙烯共聚物(EVA)共混型热塑性弹性体(TPE),并对其力学性能和微观相结构进行了研究。结果表明,动态硫化EPDM/EVA型TPE的拉伸强度及撕裂强度均随EVA含量的增加而提高,当EVA含量低于50wt.%时,其应力-应变曲线呈现出典型的弹性体特征;EPDM/EVA的共混比为60/40时,所制备的TPE表现出了良好的综合性能;EPDM分散相粒径在20μm以下且较均匀地分散EVA基体中。     

动态硫化PP／EPDM／莫来石性能的研究

采用双螺杆挤出机制备了一系列聚丙烯(PP)/三元乙丙橡胶(EPDM)共混型热塑性弹性体(TPE).研究了莫来石对用不同动态硫化剂硫化的EPDM/PP TPE的力学性能、耐热性能,加工性能的影响,并与碳酸钙填充的效果进行了比较.结果表明,动态硫化制备的EPDM/PP TPE性能远高于非硫化的EPDM/PP共混物的性能.其冲击强度提高2倍,维卡软化点提高20℃;过氧化物、酚醛和环氧树脂中,环氧树脂硫化的TPE综合性能最佳,过氧化物适合于制备高流动性TPE;莫来石在TPE基体中分散良好,其填充体系的增韧效果、加工性能均优于碳酸钙的,但补强效果不明显.     

硫化体系对EPDM耐热老化性能的影响

研究了普通硫化体系 (CV)、半有效硫化体系 (SEV)和有效硫化体系 (EV)的硫化特性及其对EPDM力学性能和耐热老化性能的影响 ,以及防老剂对EPDM耐热老化性能的影响。试验结果表明 ,采用SEV和EV体系硫化的硫化胶有较好的耐热老化性能 ,采用CV体系的硫化胶有较好的力学性能 ;防老剂对EPDM的耐热老化性能无明显影响。     

超临界二氧化碳发泡三元乙丙橡胶/低密度聚乙烯热塑性弹性体

研究硫化体系和橡塑比对超临界二氧化碳发泡三元乙丙橡胶（EPDM）/低密度聚乙烯（LDPE）热塑性弹性体物理性能和微观结构的影响。结果表明：采用过氧化物硫化体系的热塑性弹性体的综合物理性能优于采用硫黄硫化体系,随着硫化剂用量的增大,拉伸强度和撕裂强度有一个最大值,硬度上升;橡塑比为40/60时,物理性能达到最佳;LDPE相与EPDM相呈现“海-岛”两相微观结构;泡孔大小均匀性较好。     

防焦剂在三元乙丙橡胶中的应用

研究不同防焦剂对采用硫黄硫化体系、硫载体硫化体系和过氧化物硫化体系的三元乙丙橡胶(EPDM)的焦烧性能和物理性能的影响。结果表明:防焦剂E/C,CTP,E-80和DZ-01有效成分用量为0.5份时,对采用3种硫化体系的EPDM焦烧均起到延迟作用,防焦剂E/C的防焦效果最显著;添加防焦剂E/C的EPDM尤其是采用硫黄硫化体系的EPDM综合性能较好;随着防焦剂E/C用量的增大,采用硫黄硫化体系的EPDM焦烧时间和正硫化时间延长,拉伸性能先改善后变差,抗压缩永久变形性能改善。     

EPDM/iPB共混型热塑弹性体的制备与性能

通过对比不同共混比的EPDM/iPB共混体系动态硫化与未硫化的力学性能研究发现,动态硫化后的EPDM/iPB体系的性能明显优于未硫化的,当EPDM/iPB的配比为60/40、动态硫化的时间为6min时,综合性能较好;同时,研究了硫化剂和硫化时间等因素对EPDM/iPB力学性能的影响,结果表明:采用DCP/S作为硫化剂、...     

部分硫化的PP／LDPE／EPDM共混体系的研究

讨论了部分硫化的PP/LDPE/EPDM共混体系的硫化体系、硫化温度、硫化时间以及碳黑、滑石粉对性能的影响。结果表明:过氧化二异丙苯(DCP)与硫磺的配合使用使共混物的拉伸强度和硬度得到提高,断裂伸长率和压缩永久变形降低;碳黑与滑石粉配合使用且配比为15/15时,共混物的性能相对较好。     

废轮胎胶粉在EPDM胶料中的应用

介绍了废轮胎胶粉在EPDM胶料中的应用。试验结果表明，采用过氧化物/硫黄并用硫化体系，胶粉(60目)用量达到30份，EPDM硫化胶的性能仍然较好；胶粉改性剂选用热固性酚醛树脂较好；胶粉粒径越小，EPDM硫化胶的性能越好。     

过氧化物体系中天然橡胶/三元乙丙橡胶并用胶的共硫化

研究了以过氧化二异丙苯(DCP)/助硫化剂为硫化体系分别硫化天然橡胶(NR)/三元乙丙橡胶(EPDM)以及NR/预硫化EPDM并用胶的性能,考察了EPDM混炼胶的硫化特性,对并用硫化胶进行了.差示扫描量热分析.结果表明,NR/EPDM并用胶在使用DCP/助硫化荆硫化体系时具有较好的共硫化性;EPDM经预硫化后可以将配合剂固定其中,并能增加EPDM的硫化活性,提高了与NR并用胶的共硫化性.     

黑液-蒙脱土在丁基橡胶-三元乙丙橡胶并用体系中的应用研究

以黑液-蒙脱土(BL-MMT)为填充补强剂,制备了丁基橡胶(IIR)和三元乙丙橡胶(EPDM)的复合材料,考察了IIR与EPDM的比例、硫化体系和BL-MMT的量对BL-MMT/IIR/EPDM复合材料性能的影响。研究结果表明,IIR与EPDM比例减小可以改善BL-MMT/IIR/EPDM的加工性能,提高其耐热氧老化性能,IIR与EPDM比例为80/20时BL-MMT/IIR/EPDM复合材料的综合性能较好;普通(CV)硫化体系、半有效(SEV)硫化体系和有效(EV)硫化体系均可以使BL-MMT/IIR/EPDM复合材料共硫化,CV硫化体系得到的硫化胶综合物理性能最好,EV硫化体系得到的硫化胶耐热氧老化性能最好;综合BL-MMT/IIR/EPDM复合材料的力学性能及耐热氧老化性能,BL-MMT的填充量30份为宜。     

动态硫化EPDM/POE制备工艺与性能研究

采用动态硫化的方法制备了三元乙丙橡胶／聚乙烯烃类共聚物(EPDM／POE)热塑性弹性体。初步探讨了动态硫化EPDM／POE的共混温度、硫化剂用量等加工工艺参数对力学性能的影响。其拉伸强度和断裂伸长率随着加工温度的升高而提高；随着剪切速率的提高断裂伸长率增大，拉伸强度先增加后有所下降；提高;EPDM的比例其永久形变降低，同时硬度也下降。     

热塑性弹性体在泡沫塑料中的应用

以过氧化二异丙苯（DCP）为交联剂、偶氮二甲酰胺（AC）为发泡剂,采用化学交联法,使热塑性弹性体（TPE）、低密度聚乙烯（LDPE）、乙烯-醋酸乙烯共聚物（EVA）树脂形成泡孔均匀的发泡产品.研究了不同配比的树脂在泡沫塑料中的性能.结果表明,在LDPE、EVA中添加TPE的泡沫塑料性能均有所提高.     

Dynamic properties of rubber vibration isolators and antivibration performance of ethylene–propylene–diene monomer/nylon 6 blend systems

This article examines thermoplastic elastomers (TPEs) and thermoplastic vulcanizates (TPVs) as two types of elastomers from melt-blended and dynamically vulcanized ethylene–propylene–diene monomer (EPDM) rubber materials and nylon 6 plastic materials. A series of investigations were conducted on the mechanical properties, morphology, dynamic mechanical properties, hysteresis behavior, and dynamic antivibration properties with different nylon 6 contents. The experimental results showed that the incompatibility between EPDM and nylon 6 led to the easy destruction of the TPV materials in two interfacial polymers upon the application of an external force. Thus, after a dynamic vulcanization process, the mechanical properties of the EPDM/nylon 6 blends were not as good as those of the TPE materials. In terms of morphology, nylon 6 plastics were uniformly distributed in the EPDM/nylon 6 blends during the EPDM rubber phase before vulcanization was performed. After the dynamic vulcanization, phase inversion was produced in which rubber microparticles were formed and dispersed in the nylon 6 plastic phase. The results of dynamic mechanical analysis, compression vibration hysteresis behavior, and dynamic property antivibration experiments showed that the blends provided better vibration isolation and antivibration performance after the amount of nylon 6 was increased and EPDM and nylon 6 were blended through dynamic vulcanization. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 2008     

Combined effect of VA content and pH level of filler on properties of EPDM/SmBO3 and EPDM/ATO composites reinforced by three types of EVA

This study investigates the interaction of vinyl acetic (VA) content of ethylene‐vinyl acetate (EVA), pH level of Samarium borate (SmBO₃), and Sb‐doped SnO₂ (ATO) on reinforcement of peroxide‐cured ethylene‐propylene‐diene rubber (EPDM)/SmBO₃ and EPDM/ATO composites. It was found that EVA could both reinforce mechanical properties of EPDM, and enhance fluidity of gum during processing. During vulcanization, the interaction of VA groups and pH value of filler particles can influence the crosslink density of EPDM composites. In alkaline EPDM/SmBO₃/EVA, VA groups could hydrolyze to produce polyvinyl alcohol and reduce pH level of medium by consuming OH⁻. When dispersed in acidic EPDM/ATO/EVA, VA groups could generate polyunsaturated bonds and acetic acid during vulcanization. The double bonds could react with dicumyl peroxide (DCP) and then boost crosslink efficiency of EPDM composites. Moreover, acetic acid and reduction of pH value could make DCP decompose into ions, and lower crosslink density of EPDM composites. In addition to the contribution of crosslink density, EVA could crystallize in EPDM composites to reinforce EPDM composites. Electric properties of EPDM were also affected. Surface and volume resistivity of EPDM composites decreased with the rise of VA content. As for EPDM/SmBO₃/EVA composites, the growth of VA groups could boost dielectric constant and loss, decrease dielectric strength, due to the enhancement of polarity and reduction of crosslink density. In terms of EPDM/ATO/EVA composites, the EPDM/ATO/EVA14 possesses the highest dielectric constant and loss, and the lowest dielectric strength, because of the competing effect of VA content and crosslink density. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2010     

LDPE/EVA鞋底发泡材料的研究

讨论了发泡剂偶氮二甲酰胺(AC)、橡胶(EPDM、NBR)、填料超细碳酸钙(CaCO3)用量对LDPE／EVA发泡材料性能的影响，研制出发泡材料密度及力学性能满足运动鞋中底要求的配方。结果表明：AC用量为6份时，发泡材料密度达到0．078g／cm^3；EPDM有效改善了发泡材料的强度，当EPDM加入15份时，发泡材料密度和力学性能优异；超细CaCO3可以提高LDPE／EVA／NBR发泡材料的强度，当超细CaCO3用量为30份时，发泡材料性能较好。     

Exploring the simultaneous effect of nano‐silica reinforcement and electron‐beam irradiation on a model LDPE/EVA‐based TPE system

BACKGROUND: The technical properties of polyolefinic thermoplastic elastomer (TPE) systems can be modified significantly using fillers like nano‐silica. Controlled irradiation can potentially be an effective way of tailoring the technical properties of such nano‐silica‐filled TPE systems. RESULTS: The effect of controlled electron‐beam irradiation on the properties of a pristine silica nanoparticle‐filled model low‐density polyethylene/ethylene–(vinyl acetate) (LDPE/EVA) TPE system is explored in this paper. The morphology of such a filled system was investigated using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and field‐emission SEM. The dispersion of silica particles was analysed using transmission electron microscopy which clearly indicates that at low loading a fine dispersion of silica occurs in the polymer matrix. Swelling studies and Fourier transform infrared analyses indicate the occurrence of a favourable EVA–silica interaction. On the whole, it is observed that electron‐beam irradiation induces a high degree of reinforcement in all the silica‐filled samples through interfacial crosslinking as well as controlled crosslinking in the two polymer phases. In a few samples the processing characteristics are remarkably preserved following concurrent nano‐silica reinforcement and irradiation, while the technical properties of TPE systems, including set, solvent swelling and mechanical properties, are improved. However, the improvement in properties is a strong function of sequence of addition of filler in the LDPE/EVA blends. CONCLUSION: The green technique studied can be potentially extended for the improvement of the technical properties of conventional TPE systems. Copyright © 2009 Society of Chemical Industry     

LDPE/NR反应型热塑性弹性体性能的研究

研究了低密度聚乙烯（ＬＤＰＥ） 与天然橡胶（ＮＲ） 共混物的性能，探讨了不同含量的硫磺、增容剂ＥＶＡ 对共混物力学性能及加工性能的影响，获得了综合性能较好的热塑性弹性体。     

动态硫化EVA/BR热塑性弹性体的增强研究

采用动态硫化法制备了乙烯-醋酸乙烯共聚物(EVA)/顺丁橡胶(BR)共混型热塑性弹性体(TPE),通过在树脂相中添加HDPE的方式对复合体系进行增强,对其力学性能及断面微观结构进行了研究。结果表明,对于动态硫化EVA/BR共混型TPE,当HDPE填充量在0～30phr的范围内,其动态硫化产物均表现出TPE的特征;随着树脂相中HDPE用量的提高,复合体系的拉伸强度、撕裂强度、邵氏硬度趋于显著提高,断裂伸长率趋于缓慢增加,而扯断永久形变则始终低于25%;FE-SEM的观察表明,动态硫化TPE的拉伸断面上两相界面结合良好;刻蚀样品表面的硫化胶粒子的尺寸在5mm左右且均匀分散。     

超临界二氧化碳发泡EPDM/LDPE热塑性弹性体微孔泡沫

本文通过熔融共混制得了EPDM/LDPE热塑性弹性体,压制标准试样,然后使用超临界二氧化碳作为发泡剂在高压反应釜中进行物理发泡。通过万能拉力机测试了弹性体力学性能,用扫描电镜观察了拉伸断面和泡孔的微观结构。结果表明：DCP硫化体系的热塑性弹性体的综合力学性能要优于硫黄硫化体系,随着硫化剂用量的增多,拉伸强度和撕裂强度有一个最大值,硬度上升;橡塑比在4:6时,力学性能达到最佳,最大拉伸强度为7.5MPa,最大撕裂强度为27.6MPa。扫描电镜观察其拉伸断面形貌,表明EPDM橡胶相与LDPE塑料相呈现“海-岛”两相微观结构;泡孔大小均匀性较好,成功制备了微米级微孔泡沫且泡孔大小分布均匀。     

Experimental investigation on the abrasive wear behavior of nanoclay‐filled EVA/LDPE composites

The article presents the results of experimental investigation on three‐body abrasive wear behavior of nanoclay‐filled EVA/LDPE (NC‐EVA/LDPE) composites. NC‐EVA/LDPE composites with and without compatibilizer were prepared by Brabender Co‐Twin extruder (Make: CMEI, Model: 16CME, SPL) and poly(ethylene‐co‐glycidyl methacrylate) was used as the compatibilizer. The mechanical properties were evaluated using Universal testing machine. In three‐body wear tests, silica sand particles of size 200–250 μm were used as dry and loose abrasives. Three‐body abrasive wear studies were carried out using dry sand/rubber wheel abrasion test rig. The effect of abrading distance on the abrasive wear behavior of neat EVA, EVA/LDPE, and NC‐EVA/LDPE composites was reported. The results showed that the wear volume loss is increased with increase in abrading distance and the specific wear rate decreased with increase in abrading distance. However, the presence of nanoclay filler in EVA/LDPE composite showed a promising trend. Abrasive wear volume of the composites was correlated with mechanical properties such as hardness, tensile strength, and percentage elongation. However, higher weight percentage of LDPE in EVA increased the wear rate. The results indicate that NC‐EVA/LDPE with compatibilizer composite exhibits good abrasive wear resistance compared with NC‐EVA/LDPE without compatibilizer. Attempts to explain these differing trends are made in this work by analyzing the features observed on the worn surface samples by employing scanning electron microscopy (SEM). POLYM. COMPOS., 2010. © 2009 Society of Plastics Engineers