Experience with approximate reliability-based optimization methods II: an exhaust system problem

Traditional reliability-based design optimization (RBDO) requires a double-loop iteration process. The inner optimization loop is to find the reliability and the outer is the regular optimization loop to optimize the RBDO problem with reliability objectives or constraints. It is known that the computation can be prohibitive when the associated function evaluation is expensive. This situation is even worse when a large number of reliability constraints are present. As a result, many approximate RBDO methods, which convert the double loop to a single loop, have been developed. In this research, an engineering problem with a large number of constraints (144) is designed to test RBDO methods based on the first-order reliability method (FORM), including single- and double-loop methods. In addition to the number of constraints, this problem possesses many local minimums. Some original authors of the RBDO methods are also asked to solve the same problem. The results and the efficiencies for different methods are published and discussed.     

An approximate sequential optimization and reliability assessment method for reliability-based design optimization

Sequential optimization and reliability assessment (SORA) is one of the most popular decoupled approaches to solve reliability-based design optimization (RBDO) problem because of its efficiency and robustness. In SORA, the double loop structure is decoupled through a serial of cycles of deterministic optimization and reliability assessment. In each cycle, the deterministic optimization and reliability assessment are performed sequentially and the boundaries of violated constraints are shifted to the feasible direction according to the reliability information obtained in the previous cycle. In this paper, based on the concept of SORA, approximate most probable target point (MPTP) and approximate probabilistic performance measure (PPM) are adopted in reliability assessment. In each cycle, the approximate MPTP needs to be reserved, which will be used to obtain new approximate MPTP in the next cycle. There is no need to evaluate the performance function in the deterministic optimization since the approximate PPM and its sensitivity are used to formulate the linear Taylor expansion of the constraint function. One example is used to illustrate that the approximate MPTP will approach the accurate MPTP with the iteration. The design variables and the approximate MPTP converge simultaneously. Numerical results of several examples indicate the proposed method is robust and more efficient than SORA and other common RBDO methods.     

Convergence control of single loop approach for reliability-based design optimization

For solution of reliability-based design optimization (RBDO) problems, single loop approach (SLA) shows high efficiency. Thus SLA is extensively used in RBDO. However, the iteration solution procedure by SLA is often oscillatory and non-convergent for RBDO with nonlinear performance function. This prevents the application of SLA to engineering design problems. In this paper, the chaotic single loop approach (CLSA) is proposed to achieve the convergence control of original iterative algorithm in SLA. The modification involves automated selection of the chaos control factor by solving a novel one-dimensional optimization model. Additionally, a new oscillation-checking method is constructed to detect the oscillation of iterative process of design variables. The computational capability of CLSA is demonstrated through five benchmark examples and one stiffened shell application. The comparison of numerical results indicates that CSLA is more efficient than the double loop approach and the decoupled approach. CSLA also solves the RBDO problems with highly nonlinear performance function and non-normal random variables stably.     

Single loop single vector approach using the conjugate gradient in reliability based design optimization

Conventional reliability-based design optimization (RBDO) approaches require high computing costs. Among the existing RBDO methods, the single loop single vector approach (SLSV) converts the RBDO problem into a single loop deterministic optimization. Hence, it can efficiently reduce the design cost compared to other methods. However, this method has a weakness in that instability or inaccuracy in convergence can be increased according to the problem characteristics. It often happens when the performance function is highly nonlinear or concave. In this study, a novel method is proposed to overcome the problems. It is an SLSV method using the conjugate gradient that is calculated with the gradient directions at the most probable points (MPP) of the previous cycles. Mathematical examples and structural applications are solved to verify the proposed method. The numerical performances of the proposed method are compared with other RBDO methods such as the RIA, PMA, SORA and SLSV approaches. It is shown that the SLSV method using the conjugate gradient (SLSVCG) is not greatly influenced by problem characteristics and the convergence capability is quite superior. Also, the computational cost of the proposed method is significantly reduced and an excellent solution satisfying the specified reliability is obtained.     

Response surface single loop reliability-based design optimization with higher-order reliability assessment

Reliability-based design optimization (RBDO) aims at determination of the optimal design in the presence of uncertainty. The available Single-Loop approaches for RBDO are based on the First-Order Reliability Method (FORM) for the computation of the probability of failure, along with different approximations in order to avoid the expensive inner loop aiming at finding the Most Probable Point (MPP). However, the use of FORM in RBDO may not lead to sufficient accuracy depending on the degree of nonlinearity of the limit-state function. This is demonstrated for an extensively studied reliability-based design for vehicle crashworthiness problem solved in this paper, where all RBDO methods based on FORM strongly violates the probabilistic constraints. The Response Surface Single Loop (RSSL) method for RBDO is proposed based on the higher order probability computation for quadratic models previously presented by the authors. The RSSL-method bypasses the concept of an MPP and has high accuracy and efficiency. The method can solve problems with both constant and varying standard deviation of design variables and is particularly well suited for typical industrial applications where general quadratic response surface models can be used. If the quadratic response surface models of the deterministic constraints are valid in the whole region of interest, the method becomes a true single loop method with accuracy higher than traditional SORM. In other cases, quadratic response surface models are fitted to the deterministic constraints around the deterministic solution and the RBDO problem is solved using the proposed single loop method.     

An efficient strategy for reliability-based multidisciplinary design optimization using BLISS

This paper presents an efficient reliability-based multidisciplinary design optimization (RBMDO) strategy. The conventional RBMDO has tri-level loops: the first level is an optimization in the deterministic space, the second one is a reliability analysis in the probabilistic space, and the third one is the multidisciplinary analysis. Since it is computationally inefficient when high-fidelity simulation methods are involved, an efficient strategy is proposed. The strategy [named probabilistic bi-level integrated system synthesis (ProBLISS)] utilizes a single-level reliability-based design optimization (RBDO) approach, in which the reliability analysis and optimization are conducted in a sequential manner by approximating limit state functions. The single-level RBDO is associated with the BLISS formulation to solve RBMDO problems. Since both the single-level RBDO and BLISS are mainly driven by approximate models, the accuracy of models can be a critical issue for convergence. The convergence of the strategy is guaranteed by employing the trust region–sequential quadratic programming framework, which validates approximation models in the trust region radius. Two multidisciplinary problems are tested to verify the strategy. ProBLISS significantly reduces the computational cost and shows stable convergence while maintaining accuracy.     

Reliability-based structural design optimization: hybridized conjugate mean value approach

The efficiency and robustness of reliability techniques are important in reliability-based design optimization (RBDO). Commonly, advanced mean value (AMV) is utilized in reliability loop of RBDO but unstable solutions using AMV may be obtained for highly concave performance functions. Owing to the challenges of commonly reliability methods, the conjugate gradient analysis (CGA) is proposed as a robust methodology but it shows inefficient results for convex constraints. In this research, hybrid conjugate mean value (HCMV) method is proposed using sufficient condition for the enhancement of efficiency and robustness of RBDO. The CGA and AMV are dynamically utilized for simple solution of convex/concave constraints using sufficient descent criterion in HCMV. The HCMV is used to evaluate the convergence performances and is compared with numerous existing reliability methods through three reliability problems (two concave/convex mathematical examples and one applicable structure) and four RBDO problems. From the numerical results, the HCMV exhibited the better efficiency, and robustness compared to other studied formulations in reliability and RBDO problems.

     

An inverse-measure-based unilevel architecture for reliability-based design optimization

Reliability-based design optimization (RBDO) is a methodology for finding optimized designs that are characterized with a low probability of failure. Primarily, RBDO consists of optimizing a merit function while satisfying reliability constraints. The reliability constraints are constraints on the probability of failure corresponding to each of the failure modes of the system or a single constraint on the system probability of failure. The probability of failure is usually estimated by performing a reliability analysis. During the last few years, a variety of different formulations have been developed for RBDO. Traditionally, these have been formulated as a double-loop (nested) optimization problem. The upper level optimization loop generally involves optimizing a merit function subject to reliability constraints, and the lower level optimization loop(s) compute(s) the probabilities of failure corresponding to the failure mode(s) that govern(s) the system failure. This formulation is, by nature, computationally intensive. Researchers have provided sequential strategies to address this issue, where the deterministic optimization and reliability analysis are decoupled, and the process is performed iteratively until convergence is achieved. These methods, though attractive in terms of obtaining a workable reliable design at considerably reduced computational costs, often lead to premature convergence and therefore yield spurious optimal designs. In this paper, a novel unilevel formulation for RBDO is developed. In the proposed formulation, the lower level optimization (evaluation of reliability constraints in the double-loop formulation) is replaced by its corresponding first-order Karush–Kuhn–Tucker (KKT) necessary optimality conditions at the upper level optimization. Such a replacement is computationally equivalent to solving the original nested optimization if the lower level optimization problem is solved by numerically satisfying the KKT conditions (which is typically the case). It is shown through the use of test problems that the proposed formulation is numerically robust (stable) and computationally efficient compared to the existing approaches for RBDO.     

Conservative reliability-based design optimization method with insufficient input data

Reliability analysis and reliability-based design optimization (RBDO) require an exact input probabilistic model to obtain accurate probability of failure (PoF) and RBDO optimum design. However, often only limited input data is available to generate the input probabilistic model in practical engineering problems. The insufficient input data induces uncertainty in the input probabilistic model, and this uncertainty forces the PoF to be uncertain. Therefore, it is necessary to consider the PoF to follow a probability distribution. In this paper, the probability of the PoF is obtained with consecutive conditional probabilities of input distribution types and parameters using the Bayesian approach. The approximate conditional probabilities are obtained under reasonable assumptions, and Monte Carlo simulation is applied to calculate the probability of the PoF. The probability of the PoF at a user-specified target PoF is defined as the conservativeness level of the PoF. The conservativeness level, in addition to the target PoF, will be used as a probabilistic constraint in an RBDO process to obtain a conservative optimum design, for limited input data. Thus, the design sensitivity of the conservativeness level is derived to support an efficient optimization process. Using numerical examples, it is demonstrated that the conservativeness level should be involved in RBDO when input data is limited. The accuracy and efficiency of the proposed design sensitivity method is verified. Finally, conservative RBDO optimum designs are obtained using the developed methods for limited input data problems.     

An efficient method of solving design optimization problems with arbitrary random distributions in gradient-based design spaces

Reliability-Based Design Optimization (RBDO) algorithms, such as Reliability Index Approach (RIA) and Performance Measure Approach (PMA), have been developed to solve engineering optimization problems under design uncertainties. In some existing methods, the random design space is transformed to standard normal design space and the reliability assessment, such as reliability index from RIA or performance measure from PMA, is estimated in order to evaluate the failure probability. When the random variable is arbitrarily distributed and cannot be properly fitted to any known form of probability density function, the existing RBDO methods cannot perform reliability analysis in the original design space. This paper proposes a novel Ensemble of Gradient-based Transformed Reliability Analyses (EGTRA) to evaluate the failure probability of any arbitrarily distributed random variables in the original design space. The arbitrary distribution of the random variable is approximated by a merger of multiple Gaussian kernel functions in a single-variate coordinate that is directed toward the gradient of the constraint function. The failure probability is then estimated using the ensemble of each kernel reliability analysis. This paper further derives a linearly approximated probabilistic constraint at the design point with allowable reliability level in the original design space using the aforementioned fundamentals and techniques. Numerical examples with generated random distributions show that existing RBDO algorithms can improperly approximate the uncertainties as Gaussian distributions and provide solutions with poor assessments of reliabilities. On the other hand, the numerical results show EGTRA is capable of efficiently solving the RBDO problems with arbitrarily distributed uncertainties.