Novel measurement system for respiratory aerosols and droplets in indoor environments

The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has created a great demand for a better understanding of the spread of viruses in indoor environments. A novel measurement system consisting of one portable aerosol-emitting mannequin (emitter) and a number of portable aerosol-absorbing mannequins (recipients) was developed that can measure the spread of aerosols and droplets that potentially contain infectious viruses. The emission of the virus from a human is simulated by using tracer particles solved in water. The recipients inhale the aerosols and droplets and quantify the level of solved tracer particles in their artificial lungs simultaneously over time. The mobile system can be arranged in a large variety of spreading scenarios in indoor environments and allows for quantification of the infection probability due to airborne virus spreading. This study shows the accuracy of the new measurement system and its ability to compare aerosol reduction measures such as regular ventilation or the use of a room air purifier.     

A Potent Mimetic of the Siglec-8 Ligand 6’-Sulfo-Sialyl Lewisx

Siglecs are members of the immunoglobulin gene family containing sialic acid binding N-terminal domains. Among them, Siglec-8 is expressed on various cell types of the immune system such as eosinophils, mast cells and weakly on basophils. Cross-linking of Siglec-8 with monoclonal antibodies triggers apoptosis in eosinophils and inhibits degranulation of mast cells, making Siglec-8 a promising target for the treatment of eosinophil- and mast cell-associated diseases such as asthma. The tetrasaccharide 6’-sulfo-sialyl Lewis^x has been identified as a specific Siglec-8 ligand in glycan array screening. Here, we describe an extended study enlightening the pharmacophores of 6’-sulfo-sialyl Lewis^x and the successful development of a high-affinity mimetic. Retaining the neuraminic acid core, the introduction of a carbocyclic mimetic of the Gal moiety and a sulfonamide substituent in the 9-position gave a 20-fold improved binding affinity. Finally, the residence time, which usually is the Achilles tendon of carbohydrate/lectin interactions, could be improved.     

Role of Perceived Importance in Intergroup Contact.

Furthering G. W. Allport's (1954) contentions for optimal contact, the authors introduce a new construct: the perceived importance of contact. They propose that perceived importance is the best proximal predictor of contact's reduction of prejudice. If individuals have opportunities for contact at work or in the neighborhood, their chances to have intergroup acquaintances and friends increase. Intergroup contact among acquaintances and friends can be perceived as more or less important, which in turn determines intergroup evaluations. A 1st study shows that the new measure of perceived importance is indeed distinct from established quantity and quality indicators. The results are cross-validated in a 2nd study that also sheds light on the meaning of importance. In 3rd and 4th studies, structural equation analyses and a meta-analysis support the hypotheses. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Sound localization in the median sagittal plane by listeners with presbyacusis

In Experiment 1, a group of listeners with substantial hearing loss due to presbyacusis and a group of listeners with normal hearing were given three localization tests: a frontal plane test in which they judged whether sounds came from the left, overhead, or the right; a sagittal plane test in which they judged whether sounds came from directly in front, overhead, or behind; and an elevation test in which they judged the vertical position of sounds coming from in front. The two groups performed similarly on the frontal plane test, which chiefly depended upon their ability to use binaural localization cues. They performed differently on the sagittal plane and elevation tests, for which the predominant localization cues were spectral. The listeners with presbyacusis were substantially less accurate than those with normal hearing in both of these instances. They had particular difficulty judging source elevation, rarely scoring much above chance. Follow-up testing of a group of subjects in the early stages of presbyacusis showed localization performance that was intermediate to the other two groups, but far more like that of the normal-hearing listeners. In Experiment 2, additional tests were run with the following conditions designed to encourage improved performance by listeners with presbyacusic hearing loss: (1) filtering of stimuli to preclude masking of more informative high-frequency components by low frequencies; (2) simplification of the elevation test and greater spatial separation of its loudspeaker sources; and (3) use of hearing aids. Conditions 1 and 2 had no appreciable effect on performance; condition 3 significantly improved presbyacusic listeners' ability to localize in the sagittal plane, particularly when sounds came from the front.