| 诱导法和并联循环法脱铜砷的对比分析 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 郑志萍,陈崇善.诱导法和并联循环法脱铜砷的对比分析[J].铜业工程,2011(6):29-33,62. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 郑志萍 陈崇善 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 紫金铜业有限公司,福建龙岩,364205 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 介绍了紫金铜业的诱导法和某厂的并联循环电积脱铜砷,并对两者工艺流程、特点和应用情况进行对比分析。诱导法脱杂环保、全面,但能耗较大、电效不高。并联循环法在对砷有很好的脱除率和电流效率,需处理黑铜量少,工艺参数控制简单。
|
| 关 键 词： | 诱导法 并联循环 电积脱铜砷 电解液净化 除杂 电流效率 |
A Contrastive Analysis of Derivative Method and Parallel-Cycle Method for Cu&As Removal |
| |
| ZHENG Zhi-ping
,
CHEN Chong-shan.A Contrastive Analysis of Derivative Method and Parallel-Cycle Method for Cu&As Removal[J].Copper Engineering,2011(6):29-33,62. |
| |
| Authors: | ZHENG Zhi-ping CHEN Chong-shan |
| |
| Affiliation: | ZHENG Zhi-ping,CHEN Chong-shan(Zijin Copper Co.,Ltd.,Longyan 364205,Fujian,China) |
| |
| Abstract: | Derivative method in Zijin Copper Co.,Ltd.and Parallel-Cycle electrowinning method in a factory for Cu & As removal are introduced in the paper.The technological process,characteristics and application condition of both are contrastive analyzed.The derivative method electrowinning is eco-friendly and comprehensive,but energy consumption is big and current efficiency is inefficient.The parallel-cycle electrowinning has a very good de-As rate and a high current efficiency,small amount of black copper is produ... |
| |
| Keywords: | Derivative method parallel-cycle Cu & As removal by electrowinning electrolyte purification impurity removal current efficiency |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
