首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

基于多渠道供应链博弈的线上价格策略
引用本文:刘 昊,王志平,李桃迎.基于多渠道供应链博弈的线上价格策略[J].计算机工程与应用,2019,55(4):248-254.
作者姓名:刘 昊  王志平  李桃迎
作者单位:大连海事大学 航运经济与管理学院,辽宁 大连 116026
基金项目:国家社会科学基金项目(No.15CGL031);大连市科技计划项目(No.2015A11GX016);大连市高层次人才创新支持计划项目(No.2015R063);中央高校基本科研业务费(No.3132016306;No.3132017085)
摘    要:对一个开辟线上直销渠道的制造商和一个双渠道零售商组成的供应链系统,考虑线下渠道促销努力及消费者搭便车行为,在零售商主导的Stackelberg博弈下,就线上价格是否一致,研究了各渠道的定价策略。结果表明:当制造商线上渠道基本市场份额较大时,对制造商和零售商来说,线上价格不一致是最优策略。当制造商线上渠道基本市场份额较小时,双方都倾向拥有线上价格的决定权;并且当制造商承担部分促销成本时,零售商能接受制造商决定线上价格。

关 键 词:多渠道  促销努力  搭便车  线上线下  价格一致

Online Price Strategy Based on Multi-Channel Supply Chain Game
LIU Hao,WANG Zhiping,LI Taoying.Online Price Strategy Based on Multi-Channel Supply Chain Game[J].Computer Engineering and Applications,2019,55(4):248-254.
Authors:LIU Hao  WANG Zhiping  LI Taoying
Affiliation:Transportation Management College, Dalian Maritime University, Dalian, Liaoning 116026, China
Abstract:For the supply chain composed of an opening online channel manufacturer and a dual-channel retailer, considering the sales efforts of offline stores and the free-riding behavior of consumers, the pricing strategy is studied with the retailer-dominated Stackelberg game in the condition whether the online price is consistent. The results show that online price inconsistency is the best strategy for manufacturers and retailers when the basic market share of manufacturer’s online channels is large. When it’s small, both sides tend to have the online price decision, meanwhile, the retailer can accept the manufacturer to determine the online price if the manufacturer assumes part of the sales cost.
Keywords:multi-channel  sales efforts  free-riding  online and offline  price consistent  
本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《计算机工程与应用》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《计算机工程与应用》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号