首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

电子鼻对驼乳中牛乳掺假的快速检测
引用本文:吴丹丹,其布勒,斯仁达来,何静,吉日木图.电子鼻对驼乳中牛乳掺假的快速检测[J].食品工业科技,2021,42(11):263-267.
作者姓名:吴丹丹  其布勒  斯仁达来  何静  吉日木图
作者单位:1.内蒙古农业大学乳品生物技术与工程教育部重点实验室,内蒙古呼和浩特 0100182.内蒙古骆驼研究院,内蒙古巴丹吉林 737300
基金项目:内蒙古科技成果转化专项;内蒙古自治区科技创新引导项目(KCMS2018048);中蒙骆驼天然生物资源的收集及开发利用(2020YFE0203300);内蒙古自然科学基金项目(2018BS03017);双一流学科创新团队建设(NDSC2018-14);高层次人才引进科研启动项目(NDYB2017-28);高层次人才引进科研启动项目(NDYB2018-48)
摘    要:为了迅速准确地鉴别掺假骆驼乳的气味特征,本研究以阿拉善双峰骆驼乳为研究对象,驼乳按照不同掺假浓度分为0.1%、1%、3%、5%、10%、15%、20%和100%的牛乳梯度进行制备。根据掺假驼乳的气味特征,通过电子鼻10个传感器和多变量结合分析更快速、准确的评价掺假驼乳。最后,对验证集中的掺假驼乳样品数据进行验证。结果表明:基于电子鼻对掺假乳样挥发性成分响应值的前两个主成分为85.1%、偏最小二乘判别模型的相关系数为R2X=0.842,R2Y=0.628,Q2=0.618;揭示电子鼻可有效区分驼乳或掺假驼乳样品,且检测驼乳中牛乳掺假的最低检测限为1%,影响驼乳气味识别的关键电子鼻传感器为W5S传感器。此外,验证集掺假乳样PLS-DA模型的相关系数为R2X=0.81,R2Y=0.659,Q2=0.641;结果进一步证实了电子鼻用于鉴别驼乳气味的有效性。综上,本研究采用电子鼻技术实现了对驼乳中牛乳掺假后气味特征的快速、准确鉴别,为后续掺假驼乳气味特征成分的研究提供理论依据,同时也为其它食品类的掺假检测提供一种参考价值。

关 键 词:骆驼乳    牛乳    电子鼻    掺假    多元统计分析
收稿时间:2020-10-12

Rapid Detection of Adulteration in Camel Milk by Electronic Nose
WU Dandan,QI Bule,SIRendalai,HE Jing,Jirimutu.Rapid Detection of Adulteration in Camel Milk by Electronic Nose[J].Science and Technology of Food Industry,2021,42(11):263-267.
Authors:WU Dandan  QI Bule  SIRendalai  HE Jing  Jirimutu
Affiliation:1.Key Laboratory of Dairy Biotechnology and Bioengineering, Ministry of Education, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot 010018, China2.Camel Protection Association of Inner Mongolia, Badanjilin 737300, China
Abstract:In order to more quickly and accurately identify the odor characteristics of adulterated camel milk, this research takes ALaShan Bactrian camel milk as the object. The milk is prepared according to different adulteration concentrations into 0.1%, 1%, 3%, 5%, 10%, 15%, 20% and 100% milk gradients.According to the odor characteristics of adulterated camel milk, the evaluation of adulterated camel milk can be made more quickly and accurately through 10 electronic nose sensors and multivariate analysis.Finally, the data analysis of adulterated camel milk samples in the validation set was verified. The results showed that based on the response value of the electronic nose to the volatile components of adulterated milk samples, the first two principal components are 85.1%, and the correlation coefficient of the partial least squares discriminant model was R2X=0.842, R2Y=0.628, Q2=0.618. It was revealed that the electronic nose could effectively distinguish camel milk or adulterated camel milk samples, and the minimum detection limit for detecting adulterated milk in camel milk was 1%. The key electronic nose sensor that affects camel milk odor recognition was the W5S sensor. In addition, the correlation coefficients of the PLS-DA model of adulterated milk samples in the validation set were R2X=0.81, R2Y=0.659, Q2=0.641. The results further confirmed the effectiveness of the electronic nose for identifying the smell of camel milk. In summary, electronic nose technology was used to achieve rapid and accurate identification of odor characteristics of camel milk mixed with cow milk in this study, which provides a theoretical basis for the subsequent research on the odor characteristics of camel milk adulteration, and also for adulteration of other foods.
Keywords:
点击此处可从《食品工业科技》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《食品工业科技》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号