犹豫模糊语言群决策的共识性模型

针对犹豫模糊语言群决策问题,研究其共识性调整方法.首先,定义犹豫模糊语言术语集的距离测度;然后,基于该距离测度定义犹豫模糊决策矩阵间的共识性水平及其相关概念,建立共识性调整模型,该模型采用反馈机制,并且尽可能提供给专家较多的信息,以方便专家进行信息修正,达到群体共识;最后,通过具体实例说明了所提出的共识性方法的可行性和实用性.     

基于犹豫模糊语言的多阶段多属性决策方法

针对不确定语言条件下的决策问题,考虑专家偏好的阶段性差异,提出基于犹豫模糊语言的多阶段多属性决策方法。首先为了更准确地表达专家在决策过程中的犹豫性,采用犹豫模糊语言来表达专家的评估信息;其次考虑阶段权重的波动性,运用基于专家阶段性偏好的信息熵方法构建阶段权重优化模型确定阶段权重;然后利用最大化偏差法来求解属性权重,并采用基于平均解距离评价(EDAS)方法对备选方案进行排序;最后以某企业选取物流商问题为例,验证该方法的有效性和可行性。     

基于新型距离测度的概率犹豫模糊多属性群决策方法

研究属性权重已知、专家权重未知条件下的概率犹豫模糊多属性群决策问题.首先,针对传统概率犹豫模糊距离测度的不足,提出改进的新型距离测度,并对其有效性和合理性进行数学证明;其次,在属性权重向量已知的前提下,通过加权算术平均的方式实现单个专家视角下的概率犹豫模糊信息初次集结,并基于分差最大化准则构建专家权重向量求解模型,采用...     

属性权重未知情形下的q阶orthopair犹豫模糊TOPSIS法

在多属性决策问题中,q阶orthopair犹豫模糊集可以有效地处理不确定信息.基于Theil不等系数,提出一种新的q阶orthopair犹豫模糊距离测度,并研究该距离测度的性质.针对属性权重完全未知的q阶orthopair犹豫模糊多属性决策问题,构建离差最大化的属性权重模型.基于该权重确定模型和q阶orthopair犹...     

基于指数熵加权的降维犹豫模糊兰氏距离测度及应用

首先提出几种基于兰氏距离的犹豫模糊集距离测度.然后针对两个犹豫模糊数中的隶属度个数不相等问题,提出新的犹豫模糊数降维方案.该方案不需要反复添加最大最小隶属度数值到犹豫模糊数中,不仅很好地保留了数据的原始信息,而且减少了计算距离时的计算量.针对属性权重信息完全未知的情况,采用实际数据信息构造犹豫模糊指数熵,并利用信息熵最小化原则计算得到属性权重.最后利用指数熵加权的降维犹豫模糊兰氏距离测度,结合实际的医疗诊断数据进行实例分析.结果表明,所提出的基于指数熵加权的降维犹豫模糊兰氏距离测度不仅在$\lambda$取不同值时诊断结果一致,而且减少了计算量,提高了诊断效率,对实时、有效的医疗诊断具有一定的应用价值.     

大群体应急决策中考虑属性关联的偏好信息融合方法

针对大群体应急决策中属性之间相互关联的问题,提出一种新的偏好信息融合方法.首先,利用最优离散拟合模型测度专家的风险偏好,提出一种考虑专家风险偏好的犹豫模糊元补充方法;其次,运用TF-IDF算法获得相互关联的事件属性集;再次,结合传统的主成分分析法与误差理论,提出基于犹豫模糊语言的主成分分析模型,获得几个互不关联的主属性及其权重,进而进行信息集结和方案择优;最后,通过广西洪涝灾害事件验证所提方法的可行性和有效性.     

基于云模型的Pythagorean模糊语言多属性决策方法

针对专家给出的属性值为Pythagorean模糊语言且专家权重与属性权重均未知的多属性决策问题进行了研究,提出一种基于云模型的多属性决策方法。首先,根据Pythagorean模糊语言决策信息的距离熵计算得到属性权重;其次,计算决策矩阵间的距离从而得到各决策专家权重;再次,构建Pythagorean模糊云模型决策矩阵并利用专家权重和属性权重进行信息集结;最后,基于TOPSIS方法求取正、负理想解,依据理想解计算各方案贴近度并据此对各备选方案进行排序选择。案例分析表明,该方法优化了复杂环境下的决策,避免了决策信息的丢失,能够较好解决决策信息的不确定性和决策过程的随机性,具有一定的可行性和有效性。     

犹豫模糊群共识实现算法及其数据系统优选

针对犹豫模糊偏好关系（HFPR）可以在复杂的管理环境下全面描述专家的犹豫评价信息的优势,基于HFPR构建了一种犹豫模糊群共识实现算法,并将其应用于银行数据系统的选购过程中。引入一种新的一致性指数方法来衡量个体HFPR的一致性水平;为了提升群体专家对决策结果的满意度,设计了一种犹豫模糊群共识实现算法,该算法能够在群体HFPR达到共识水平的情况下保证个体HFPR仍然具有满意一致性;通过银行数据系统的选购实例和对比分析实验说明了提出的方法的实用性和有效性。     

基于证据理论的偏好型直觉模糊群决策方法

针对直觉模糊多属性群决策问题,研究属性和专家权重的确定以及信息的集结方法.利用直觉模糊熵确定属性客观权重,并根据偏好信息确定合理的属性综合权重;在属性层面区分专家权重,将直觉模糊评价值作为Mass函数,构建证据冲突度模型确定专家权重,并利用犹豫度加以修正,避免综合支持度低而对方案排序影响大的专家权重过分削弱;采用证据理论集结决策信息,根据得分值进行方案排序.最后通过算例分析,验证了所提出方法的合理性和有效性.     

基于语言共识模型的电子商务信用风险评价方法

电子商务信用风险评价能够更好地维护市场规则并防范交易主体的合法权益.从语言评价信息的角度,利用多属性群决策方法对电子商务信用风险评价方法进行探讨.首先,提出个体语言共识测度和群体语言共识测度;然后,针对共识性水平较低的决策群体,构建一种整数规划模型,用于调整决策者给出的初始语言决策信息;最后,提出一种基于语言共识模型的电子商务信用风险评价方法,并通过电子商务信用风险评价问题说明该方法的可行性和有效性.     

Entropy and Cross‐entropy for Generalized Hesitant Fuzzy Information and Their Use in Multiple Attribute Decision Making

In this paper, we present the entropy, cross‐entropy, and similarity measure for generalized hesitant fuzzy information and discuss their desirable properties. Some measure formulas are developed, and the relationships among them are investigated. We show that the similarity measure and entropy for generalized hesitant fuzzy information can be transformed by each other based on their axiomatic definitions. Then we develop two approaches for solving multiple attribute decision making, in which the attribute values are given in the form of generalized hesitant fuzzy elements (GHFEs). In the first approach, the attribute weight vector is determined by the generalized hesitant fuzzy entropies, and the optimal alternative is obtained by comparing the generalized hesitant fuzzy cross‐entropies between alternatives and positive‐ideal or negative‐ideal solutions; in the second approach, the attribute weight vector is derived from the maximizing deviation method and optimal alternative is obtained by using the technique for order preference by similarly to ideal solution (TOPSIS) method. Finally, an example is provided to illustrate the practicality and effectiveness of the developed approaches.     

Hesitant fuzzy entropy and cross‐entropy and their use in multiattribute decision‐making

We introduce the concepts of entropy and cross‐entropy for hesitant fuzzy information, and discuss their desirable properties. Several measure formulas are further developed, and the relationships among the proposed entropy, cross‐entropy, and similarity measures are analyzed, from which we can find that three measures are interchangeable under certain conditions. Then we develop two multiattribute decision‐making methods in which the attribute values are given in the form of hesitant fuzzy sets reflecting humans' hesitant thinking comprehensively. In one method, the weight vector is determined by the hesitant fuzzy entropy measure, and the optimal alternative is obtained by comparing the hesitant fuzzy cross‐entropies between the alternatives and the ideal solutions; in another method, the weight vector is derived from the maximizing deviation method and the optimal alternative is obtained by using the TOPSIS method. An actual example is provided to compare our methods with the existing ones. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Clustering-based method for large group decision making with hesitant fuzzy linguistic information: Integrating correlation and consensus

Aiming at the large-scale experts and the lower consensus in large group decision making, a novel clustering-based method integrating correlation and consensus of hesitant fuzzy linguistic information is proposed. Firstly, develop a new hesitant degree function for hesitant fuzzy linguistic element considering its scale. Secondly, put forward the correlation measure and consensus measure models combining the hesitant degree. And then present a clustering method integrating the correlation and consensus to divide the large-scale experts into several clusters. The clustering method simultaneously ensures the cohesion of clusters and the gradual increasing of the collective consensus level. After clustering, activate the selection process to update the weights of clusters combining the number of experts in clusters and the consensus level of clusters and use the score function considering the hesitant degree to rank the alternatives. Finally, a case and some comparisons are studied and analyzed to verify the rationality and effectiveness of the method.     

Linguistic hesitant intuitionistic fuzzy decision-making method based on VIKOR

Linguistic hesitant intuitionistic fuzzy set, which allows an element having several linguistic evaluation values and each linguistic argument having several intuitionistic fuzzy memberships, is a power tool to model uncertain information existing in multiple attribute decision-making problems. In this paper, we propose new methods by using TOPSIS and VIKOR for multiple attribute decision-making problems, in which evaluation values are in the form of linguistic hesitant intuitionistic fuzzy elements. Different situations of attribute weight information are considered. If attribute weights are partly known, a linear programming model is set up based on the idea that reasonable weights should make the relative closeness of each alternative evaluation value to the linguistic hesitant intuitionistic fuzzy positive ideal solution as large as possible. If attribute weights are unknown completely, an optimization model is set up based on the maximum deviation method. A numerical example is presented to illustrate feasibility and practical advantages of the proposed method. We compare the alternatives’ rankings derived from the linguistic hesitant intuitionistic fuzzy TOPSIS method with those derived from the hesitant fuzzy linguistic TOPSIS and the hesitant intuitionistic fuzzy TOPSIS approach to further illustrate their advantages.

     

犹豫模糊信息相似性测度与群一致性测度及群决策应用

针对目前关于犹豫模糊运算与测度的研究中存在的不足,首先给出犹豫模糊熵函数的定义,并将其作为犹豫模糊信息不确定性测度,进而提出犹豫模糊信息特征向量概念,以信息特征向量为出发点对犹豫模糊距离测度和相似性测度展开研究;为优化群决策过程,提出基于完全优先关系的群一致性测度概念并研究其性质;最后,提出基于相似性测度和群一致性测度的群决策方法并结合算例验证所提出方法的有效性.     

基于符号距离和交叉熵的概率犹豫模糊多属性决策方法

针对概率犹豫模糊环境下属性权重完全未知的多属性决策问题,提出基于符号距离和交叉熵的多属性决策方法.首先,定义用于测量决策者犹豫程度的3种概率犹豫模糊元的犹豫度:数值犹豫度,信息不完全度和总犹豫度,基于3种犹豫度提出概率犹豫模糊符号距离;然后,为了避免人为添加元素,定义调和概率犹豫模糊元,并结合信息不完全度提出概率犹豫模糊元的交叉熵;最后,根据概率犹豫模糊元的符号距离和交叉熵构建多属性决策模型,并通过算例验证了该模型的有效性和合理性.     

Fuzzy multi attribute group decision making method to achieve consensus under the consideration of degrees of confidence of experts’ opinions

The aim of this paper is to introduce a fuzzy multi attribute group decision making technique considering the degrees of confidence of experts’ opinions. In the process of decision making, each expert provides his/her evaluation over the alternatives depending on a finite set of attributes and constructs an individual fuzzy decision matrix. The proposed technique establishes an iterative process to aggregate the fuzzy information, given by individual expert, into group consensus opinion by using the fuzzy similarity measure. Then, based on group consensus opinion, the proposed approach utilizes the fuzzy similarity measure to find out the most desirable alternative through approximate reasoning. The proposed decision making technique is more flexible due to the fact that it considers the degrees of confidence of experts’ opinions. Finally an example has been shown to highlight the proposed methodology.     

对偶犹豫模糊集的相关系数及其应用

对偶犹豫模糊集因其可以给决策者提供更多的决策信息成为模糊决策的热点研究问题,相关性指标可以用来度量两个模糊信息之间的相关关系,熵可以用来度量模糊信息的不确定程度。提出了一种基于对偶犹豫模糊集相关系数和熵的模糊多属性群决策方法。定义了对偶犹豫模糊集相关系数的概念,讨论了其基本性质;提出了两种对偶犹豫模糊集的熵,在此基础上,给出了模糊多属性群决策的权重确定方法;基于对偶犹豫模糊集相关系数和熵,提出了一种属性权重完全未知条件下的模糊多属性群决策方法;通过案例分析说明了该方法的有效性和可行性。